There’s no doubt about it. HE is Mexican. An immigrant. “Disadvantaged.” He did not go to college and has engaged in mechanical work.
According to my analysis, that made me “first generation,” from a “working class family.” Cool. I was eligible for many scholarships and was courted by an Ivy League school.
Now I’m bourgeois. I have been acted upon affirmatively, and this turned out pretty well. I have two houses, three cars and I go on a lot of nice vacations. My friends are doctors, lawyers, Indian chiefs.
I check the white box. Or Caucasian. Whatever.
Why do I do this? It’s because of what “they” mean when they ask the question.
I know this. I work with many not-for-profit social service agencies serving a large city. O.K. New York City. Our funders always want to know – how many Blacks and Hispanics (African-American, Latino, WHATEVER) do you serve? There must be many. These people need HELP.
I don’t need help any more. I am no longer “disadvantaged.” I am decidedly advantaged. So I must be white, right?
But check out my quiet act of resistance.

I don’t mean the flag or the “proudly.” I mean the fact that I HAVE an air freshener hanging from the rear view mirror of my BMW SUV. :-)
2 comments:
When we enrolled our daughter in public school, we were asked to check off her race. We're white. Her birth father is black. Her birth mother is white. The choices were "black", "white", "Hispanic", "Asian", "Pacific Islander". No "other". I checked two boxes. Let them figure that out.
I see your point about who needs help, but what about the kind of surveys that just count people - like the census - and would therefore miss representing a prosperous Hispanic woman?
Glad you're back!
Oo, you defiant air freshener hanger you!
Post a Comment